Hetherington & Weiler put forth the theory that there
are two types of people: fixed, and fluid. The fixed have a world view of
danger: people and nature are out to get them. Fluid folks, on the other hand,
find the world a delightful place to explore, filled with good people. Fixed
people drive giant four wheel drive pickups or Hummers, keep big dogs, and
prefer plain coffee from Dunkin Donuts over fancy Starbucks concoctions. Fluid
folks drive small cars that are less damaging to the environments, like cats,
and love trying new cuisines. Oh, and fixed people tend to live rural, while
fluids congregate in the city. Most people are NOT pure forms of either, but
land somewhere in the middle of the spectrum. Now, there is nothing wrong with
being on either end of the spectrum, but… in America, these tendencies are
being used by the major parties to divide people and gain support. This is what’s
behind the growing chasm between Democrats and Republicans. The Republican Party
stresses the dangers in the world, and that they are the only candidates that
can protect the people of the USA; Democrats try to say they are supporting
programs like the ACA that will benefit all classes. Now, this is a broad brush
to paint the political/sociological scene with, but it seems, in most cases to
be true.
And it’s getting worse- the two sides don’t get together
very often. If the fixeds and the fluids worked together, partied together,
went to school together, they would learn that the other side isn’t really the
bunch of idiots they think they are. Hard to do when the Powers That Be try to
demonize the other side.
Are they right about this? Yes, I think- partly. The chasm
between sides is getting worse every day. And it’s obvious that the divide is
being used by said Powers That Be. Is it quite as simple as that? Well, no, I
don’t think so. There are a lot of other things affecting the world. But this
book is a great start to understanding the problems. The one problem I see is that
the authors are clearly biased towards one side; it happens to be the side I
mostly fall into, but it’s going to make it harder for the side they are
against to take the book seriously. Four stars.
Interesting concept. Might not be interesting enough for a whole book for me.
ReplyDelete