This is a
non-fiction book in two parts: in the first half, the author tells what’s known
about a murder that took place in 1875 England. In the second, he goes through
the evidence and interviews descendants of the people involved and presents his
theory of what happened.
Florence
Campbell was the daughter of a well to do upper middle class family who had the
worst luck in relationships. She married Alexander Ricardo, who was in the
service, and demanded that he resign because she feared for his life in the military.
He declined into total alcoholism and became abusive. When she left him and
went home, her father refused to take her in, wanting her to ‘do the right
thing’ and stand by her husband. For her to leave would reflect poorly on her
family, of course, and he couldn’t have that. When she refused to go back to
Ricardo, he agreed to send her to a sanitarium for a stay ‘for health reasons’.
There she met Dr. Gully, the much older, married, owner of the sanitarium and
they started an affair. During this time, Ricardo had the good grace to die,
leaving Florence a rich widow. It did not do her much good, however, because
word of her affair got out, ruining her in society. She was happy to marry
Charles Bravo, as this made her acceptable to society again. He was happy to
marry her, as she was very rich and let him spend her money freely. Bravo would
have had it made had he not been a mean and greedy man, dismissing Florence’s servants
and getting rid of everything that he personally had no interest in, such as
the garden and the horses. He became emotionally, sexually, and physically abusive
to Florence. Then one evening he became violently ill. Doctors were called and
they realized he had swallowed poison. After three horrible days, he died. Was
is suicide, as Florence’s paid companion claimed? Or had someone poisoned him?
If so, who? There was no lack of people that he had angered. Despite an
inquest, no one was ever charged with Bravo’s death.
Ruddick’s
examination of the evidence convinced me pretty well that he has fingered the
right suspect. He was able to find out
things from the descendants that never came out at the inquest. There were also
presumptions about what people of different classes and sexes would and wouldn’t
do that colored the minds of the investigators. Had this same crime been
committed today, there would have most likely have been a conviction. An
interesting piece of Victorian true crime.
No comments:
Post a Comment