Ever since reading (and watching the TV series) ‘The Forsyte
Saga’ in my teens I’ve had a passion for late Victorian/Edwardian British
stories. I was very excited to receive a copy of ‘Habits of the House’ set in
1899.
The story revolves around the household of the Earl of
Dilberne. He himself is deeply in debt, from both business ventures gone badly
and from trying to keep up with his friend, the spendthrift Price of Wales; his
wife, Isobel, daughter of a tradesman who brought money to the marriage, spends
on clothing and dinners. His daughter, Rosina, spends her time going to
lectures of the leftist kind and despises the moneyed class while enjoying the
advantages it offers. His son and heir Arthur cares nothing for business or
politics, freely spending on clothing, his mistress, and his steam powered
automobiles. When the latest venture, a gold mine in Africa ,
is taken and flooded by the Boers, bankruptcy looms. The earl and his lady’s
reaction to this is that their children (in their 20s) must marry for money. Everyone
has their own opinion on how this should be accomplished, including the staff
of servants who have a surprising influence on the lives of their employers.
What follows is a tangled web of greed, bigotry, and lies. There
are no blameless characters here, but neither are there any monsters. These are
all just flawed human beings, most of whom are fairly decent at heart. They are
muddling through their lives, regretting their pasts, and trying to puzzle out
what kind of future the want. These are not particularly deep characters; they
are rather sketchy.
I enjoyed the book. Despite the unusual layout – a lot of
very short chapters, each devoted to a character’s actions in a short period of
time- sometimes as little as an hour- it reads fast. The entire book takes
place over the span of a little less than two months- but the first 86 pages is
devoted to a single day. At the beginning I did have trouble at times figuring
out which character was which. There is enough description to set the reader
firmly in the era. Standing outside of the time, the author skewers the manners
and prejudices of the time. Is it great literature? No. Is it good enough that
I’ll be seeking out the next two volumes? Yes.
No comments:
Post a Comment